Sql state 42p01 ошибка

PostgreSQL error 42P01 actually makes users dumbfounded, especially the newbies.

Usually, this error occurs due to an undefined table in newly created databases.

That’s why at Bobcares, we often get requests to fix PostgreSQL errors, as a part of our Server Management Services.

Today, let’s have a look into the PostgreSQL error 42P01 and see how our Support Engineers fix it.

What is PostgreSQL error 42P01?

PostgreSQL has a well-defined error code description. This helps in identifying the reason for the error.

Today, let’s discuss in detail about PostgreSQL error 42P01. The typical error code in PostgreSQL appears as:

ERROR: relation "[Table name]" does not exist

SQL state:42P01

Here the 42P01 denotes an undefined table.

So, the code description clearly specifies the basic reason for the error.

But what does an undefined table means?

Let’s discuss it in detail.

Causes and fixes for the PostgreSQL error 42P01

Customer query on undefined tables of a database often shows up the 42P01 error.

Now let’s see a few situations when our customers get the 42P01 error. We will also see how our Support Engineers fix this error.

1. Improper database setup

Newbies to Postgres often make mistakes while creating a new database. Mostly, this improper setup ends up in a 42P01 error.

In such situations, our Support Team guides them for easy database setup.

Firstly, we create a new database. Next, we create a new schema and role. We give proper privileges to tables.

Postgres also allows users to ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.

2. Unquoted identifiers

Some customers create tables with mixed-case letters.

Usually, the unquoted identifiers are folded into lowercase. So, when the customer queries the table name with the mixed case it shows 42P01 error.

The happens as the PostgreSQL has saved the table name in lower case.

To resolve this error, our Support Engineers give mixed case table name in quotes. Also, we highly recommend to NOT use quotes in database names. Thus it would make PostgreSQL behave non-case sensitive.

3. Database query on a non-public schema

Similarly, the PostgreSQL 42P01 error occurs when a user queries a non-public schema.

Usually, this error occurs if the user is unaware of the proper Postgres database query.

For instance, the customer query on table name ‘pgtable‘ was:

SELECT * FROM  pgtable

This query is totally correct in case of a public schema. But, for a non-public schema ‘xx’ the query must be:

SELECT * FROM  "xx"."pgtable"

Hence, our Support Engineers ensure that the query uses the correct schema name.

[Still having trouble in fixing PostgreSQL errors? – We’ll fix it for you.]

Conclusion

In short, PostgreSQL error 42P01 denotes the database query is on an undefined table. This error occurs due to improper database setup, unidentified table name, and so on. Today, we saw how our Support Engineers fix the undefined table error in Postgres.

PREVENT YOUR SERVER FROM CRASHING!

Never again lose customers to poor server speed! Let us help you.

Our server experts will monitor & maintain your server 24/7 so that it remains lightning fast and secure.

GET STARTED

var google_conversion_label = «owonCMyG5nEQ0aD71QM»;

I’m having this strange problem using PostgreSQL 9.3 with tables that are created using qoutes. For instance, if I create a table using qoutes:

create table "TEST" ("Col1" bigint);

the table is properly created and I can see that the quotes are preserved when view it in the SQL pane of pgAdminIII. But when I query the DB to find the list of all available tables (using the below query), I see that the result does not contain quotes around the table name.

select table_schema, table_name from information_schema.tables where not table_schema='pg_catalog' and not table_schema='information_schema';

Since the table was created with quotes, I can’t use the table name returned from the above query directly since it is unquoted and throws the error in posted in the title.

I could try surrounding the table names with quotes in all queries but I’m not sure if it’ll work all the time. I’m looking for a way to get the list of table names that are quoted with quotes in the result.

I’m having the same issue with column names as well but I’m hoping that if I can find a solution to the table names issue, a similar solution will work for column names as well.

asked Oct 29, 2014 at 13:08

Rahul Vijay Dawda's user avatar

0

you have two choices:
— no quotes: then everything will automatically be lowercase and non-case-sensitive
— with quotes: from now on everything is case sensitive.

i would highly recommend to NOT use quotes and make PostgreSQL behave non case sensitive. it makes life so much easier. once you get into quoting you got to use it EVERYWHERE as PostgreSQL will start to be very precise.

some example:

   TEST = test       <-- non case sensitive
   "Test" <> Test    <-- first is precise, second one is turned to lower case
   "Test" = "Test"   <-- will work
   "test" = TEST     <-- should work; but you are just lucky.

really try to avoid this kind of trickery at any cost. stay with 7 bit ascii for object names.

answered Oct 29, 2014 at 13:18

Hans-Jürgen Schönig's user avatar

3

While using npg package as your data store ORM you are expecting the ORM framework (Entity Framework in our case) to generate the sql statement you might face a PostgreSQL exception the relation ‘Table Name’ does not exist

Either the table is not created or the generated SQL statement is missing something. Try to debug using visual studio you will see that the schema name is not leading the table name

SELECT "ID", "Name", "CreatedBy", "CreatedDate" 
FROM "TestTable"; 

while PostgreSQL is expecting the schema name. Resolution is in the DBContext class override the OnModelCreating method and add modelBuilder.HasDefaultSchema("SchemaName"); and execute the base constructor which should look like the following

protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)   {             
  modelBuilder.HasDefaultSchema("PartyDataManager");                  
  base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);         
}

answered Feb 16, 2019 at 18:36

Wael Al Wirr's user avatar

0

in my case. table in database has to be lowercase…change name dataTable do datatable help

answered Feb 23, 2021 at 9:29

Marcel N's user avatar

Marcel NMarcel N

811 silver badge2 bronze badges

1

Keep the table name to lower case and it will solve the issue.

answered Mar 30, 2022 at 7:58

Muhammad Bilal's user avatar

A string function used to suitably quote identifiers in an SQL statement string is quote_ident(), which references a good example (used in conjunction with related quote_literal()).

To use your example, and mix in other results:

select
   quote_ident(table_schema) as table_schema,
   quote_ident(table_name) as table_name
...

 table_schema |    table_name
--------------+------------------
 ...
 public       | good_name
 public       | "table"
 public       | some_table
 public       | "something else"
 public       | "Tom's work"
 public       | "TEST"
 ...

answered Oct 30, 2014 at 22:14

Mike T's user avatar

Mike TMike T

41.2k18 gold badges152 silver badges203 bronze badges

What you had originally was a correct syntax — for tables, not for schemas. As you did not have a table (dubbed ‘relation’ in the error message), it threw the not-found error.

I see you’ve already noticed this — I believe there is no better way of learning than to fix our own mistakes ;)

But there is something more. What you are doing above is too much on one hand, and not enough on the other.

Running the script, you

  1. create a schema
  2. create a role
  3. grant SELECT on all tables in the schema created in (1.) to this new role_
  4. and, finally, grant all privileges (CREATE and USAGE) on the new schema to the new role

The problem lies within point (3.) You granted privileges on tables in replays — but there are no tables in there! There might be some in the future, but at this point the schema is completely empty. This way, the GRANT in (3.) does nothing — this way you are doing too much.

But what about the future tables?

There is a command for covering them: ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES. It applies not only to tables, but:

Currently [as of 9.4], only the privileges for tables (including views and foreign tables), sequences, functions, and types (including domains) can be altered.

There is one important limitation, too:

You can change default privileges only for objects that will be created by yourself or by roles that you are a member of.

This means that a table created by alice, who is neither you nor a role than you are a member of (can be checked, for example, by using \du in psql), will not take the prescribed access rights. The optional FOR ROLE clause is used for specifying the ‘table creator’ role you are a member of. In many cases, this implies it is a good idea to create all database objects using the same role — like mydatabase_owner.

A small example to show this at work:

CREATE ROLE test_owner; -- cannot log in
CREATE SCHEMA replays AUTHORIZATION test_owner;
GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA replays TO test_owner;

SET ROLE TO test_owner; -- here we change the context, 
                        -- so that the next statement is issued as the owner role

ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA replays GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO alice;

CREATE TABLE replays.replayer (r_id serial PRIMARY KEY);

RESET ROLE; -- changing the context back to the original role

CREATE TABLE replays.replay_event (re_id serial PRIMARY KEY);

-- and now compare the two

\dp replays.replayer
                                   Access privileges
 Schema  │   Name   │ Type  │       Access privileges       │ Column access privileges 
─────────┼──────────┼───────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────
 replays │ replayer │ table │ alice=r/test_owner           ↵│ 
         │          │       │ test_owner=arwdDxt/test_owner │ 

\dp replays.replay_event
                               Access privileges
 Schema  │     Name     │ Type  │ Access privileges │ Column access privileges 
─────────┼──────────────┼───────┼───────────────────┼──────────────────────────
 replays │ replay_event │ table │                   │ 

As you can see, alice has no explicit rights on the latter table. (In this case, she can still SELECT from the table, being a member of the public pseudorole, but I didn’t want to clutter the example by revoking the rights from public.)

PostgreSQL error 42P01 actually makes users dumbfounded, especially the newbies.

Usually, this error occurs due to an undefined table in newly created databases.

That’s why at Bobcares, we often get requests to fix PostgreSQL errors, as a part of our Server Management Services.

Today, let’s have a look into the PostgreSQL error 42P01 and see how our Support Engineers fix it.

What is PostgreSQL error 42P01?

PostgreSQL has a well-defined error code description. This helps in identifying the reason for the error.

Today, let’s discuss in detail about PostgreSQL error 42P01. The typical error code in PostgreSQL appears as:

ERROR: relation "[Table name]" does not exist

SQL state:42P01

Here the 42P01 denotes an undefined table.

So, the code description clearly specifies the basic reason for the error.

But what does an undefined table means?

Let’s discuss it in detail.

Causes and fixes for the PostgreSQL error 42P01

Customer query on undefined tables of a database often shows up the 42P01 error.

Now let’s see a few situations when our customers get the 42P01 error. We will also see how our Support Engineers fix this error.

1. Improper database setup

Newbies to Postgres often make mistakes while creating a new database. Mostly, this improper setup ends up in a 42P01 error.

In such situations, our Support Team guides them for easy database setup.

Firstly, we create a new database. Next, we create a new schema and role. We give proper privileges to tables.

Postgres also allows users to ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.

2. Unquoted identifiers

Some customers create tables with mixed-case letters.

Usually, the unquoted identifiers are folded into lowercase. So, when the customer queries the table name with the mixed case it shows 42P01 error.

The happens as the PostgreSQL has saved the table name in lower case.

To resolve this error, our Support Engineers give mixed case table name in quotes. Also, we highly recommend to NOT use quotes in database names. Thus it would make PostgreSQL behave non-case sensitive.

3. Database query on a non-public schema

Similarly, the PostgreSQL 42P01 error occurs when a user queries a non-public schema.

Usually, this error occurs if the user is unaware of the proper Postgres database query.

For instance, the customer query on table name ‘pgtable‘ was:

SELECT * FROM  pgtable

This query is totally correct in case of a public schema. But, for a non-public schema ‘xx’ the query must be:

SELECT * FROM  "xx"."pgtable"

Hence, our Support Engineers ensure that the query uses the correct schema name.

[Still having trouble in fixing PostgreSQL errors? – We’ll fix it for you.]

Conclusion

In short, PostgreSQL error 42P01 denotes the database query is on an undefined table. This error occurs due to improper database setup, unidentified table name, and so on. Today, we saw how our Support Engineers fix the undefined table error in Postgres.

PREVENT YOUR SERVER FROM CRASHING!

Never again lose customers to poor server speed! Let us help you.

Our server experts will monitor & maintain your server 24/7 so that it remains lightning fast and secure.

GET STARTED

var google_conversion_label = «owonCMyG5nEQ0aD71QM»;

What is causing go-pg to always attempt finding the pluralized name of my table?

PostgreSQL Table:

public.employeesalary (
    employeeid varchar(50),
    badgeid varchar(50),
    salary bigint
)

GO Model:

type EmployeeSalary struct {
        tableName struct{} `sql:",employeesalary"`
        EmployeeId string `sql:",pk"`
        BadgeId string
        Salary int
}

Query:

var salary int
db.Model(&EmployeeSalary{}).Column("salary").Where("badgeid = ?", emp.BadgeId[0]).Limit(1).Select(&salary)

Error:
ERROR #42P01 relation "employee_salaries" does not exist

What have I missed?

  • Remove From My Forums
  • Question

  • public bool girisKontrol(string user, string pass)
            {string sunucu, port, kullaniciadi, sifre, veritabani;
                sunucu = "localhost";
                port = "5432";
                kullaniciadi = "postgres";
                sifre = "tellioglu";
                veritabani = "postgres";
                string baglantimetni = string.Format("Server ={0};Port ={1};User ID = {2};Password = {3};Database={4};", sunucu, port, kullaniciadi, sifre, veritabani);
                var baglanti = new NpgsqlConnection();
                baglanti.ConnectionString = baglantimetni;
                var cmd = new NpgsqlCommand();
                cmd.Connection = baglanti;
                cmd.CommandText = "select * from kullanicigiris where Kullaniciadi = @Kullanici and sifre = @sifre";//kullanicigiris tablonun adi , Kullaniciadi sütünun adı,sifre sütunun adi
                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Kullanici", user);
                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@sifre", pass);
                cmd.Connection.Open();
                var reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
                var sonuc = reader.HasRows;
                reader.Close();
                reader.Dispose();
                cmd.Connection.Close();
                cmd.Connection.Dispose();
                cmd.Dispose();
                return sonuc;
    
            }

    i am using postgreSQL database . executereader(); giving ‘ERROR: 42P01: relation does not exist’ problem. is sql line wrong i dont know please help me

    
    

Answers

  • From the code sinppet, I don’t think it’s the SQL line error. In C#, we should use the SQL parameters like yours.

    But for postgreSQL, I would suggest you to try the following code to see if it works.

    cmd.CommandText = "select * from kullanicigiris where Kullaniciadi = :Kullanici and sifre = :sifre"     
           cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue(":Kullanici", user);
                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue(":sifre", pass);
    

    And there is a category for postgreSQL support query for your reference:

    http://www.postgresql.org/support/

    Hope it hleps.


    Best Regards,
    Rocky Yue[MSFT]
    MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us

    • Marked as answer by

      Wednesday, May 2, 2012 2:51 AM

8 / 5 / 3

Регистрация: 13.02.2013

Сообщений: 294

07.11.2017, 19:08

 [ТС]

1

Студворк — интернет-сервис помощи студентам

Доброго времени суток, при обращении к таблице в БД выскакивает исключение со след. «{«ОШИБКА: 42P01: отношение «dbo.name_auto» не существует»}». Дело в том, что таблица существует, но по какой-то причине найти не может, нашел след. информацию: в постгрес синтаксис иной от MS SQL и он не поддерживает формат dbo.name_auto, необходимо удалить префиксы имени владельца ( dbo в вашем случае ). Как это сделать не знаю, начал еще гуглить и опять же нашел, но никакой конкретики Wiki. Прошу помощи

0

Эксперт .NET

11441 / 7768 / 1190

Регистрация: 21.01.2016

Сообщений: 29,135

08.11.2017, 07:34

2

Kurtis, в PostgeSQL имена идентификаторов чувствительны к регистру. Для него name_auto и Name_Auto — два разных идентификатора. Причём интересно, что PostgeSQL явно переводит в нижний регистр имена идентификаторов из запросов.

Поэтому, если вы создали таблицу Name_Auto и будете искать её по имени Name_Auto, то не найдёте, ибо PostgeSQL переведёт её имя в name_auto, что уже отличается. Либо соблюдайте регистр ВЕЗДЕ и ВСЮДУ, либо заключайте имя в символы апострофов (`), тогда имя будет восприниматься буквально.

1

Kurtis

8 / 5 / 3

Регистрация: 13.02.2013

Сообщений: 294

08.11.2017, 21:14

 [ТС]

3

Usaga, Добрый вечер, Name_auto — идентификатор в context, в model. отрывок из кода:

C#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
    public class AutoContext : DbContext
    {
         public DbSet<automobile> Automobiles { get; set; }
        //public IEnumerable Automobiles { get; set; }
        public DbSet<class_auto> Class_auto { get; set; }
        public DbSet<type_auto> Type_auto { get; set; }
        [B]public DbSet<name_auto> Name_auto { get; set; }[/B]
        //public SelectList Name_auto { get; set; }
        public DbSet<color> Colors { get; set; }
        public DbSet<copmplectation> Complectations { get; set; }
    }

В БД же таблица создана с нижнем регистром. (см. вложение)

Миниатюры

Взаимодействие Postgresql с MVC проектом
 

0

Usaga

Эксперт .NET

11441 / 7768 / 1190

Регистрация: 21.01.2016

Сообщений: 29,135

09.11.2017, 06:54

4

Kurtis, вот EF и ищет таблицу «Name_auto». Укажите ему явно, в какую таблицу лукаться:

C#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
    public class AutoContext : DbContext
    {
        public DbSet<name_auto> Name_auto { get; set; }
 
        protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder builder)
        {
            builder.Entity<name_auto>()
                .ToTable("name_auto");
        }
    }

0

8 / 5 / 3

Регистрация: 13.02.2013

Сообщений: 294

09.11.2017, 20:18

 [ТС]

5

Usaga, Если он ищет «Name_auto», почему пишет ошибку связанную с «name_auto». Попробовал сделать как Вы показали, не сработало…Можно ли искать таблицу не «dbo.name_auto», а просто «name_auto», т.к. первый, как я понимаю — префикс для MS SQL. И подумать не мог о том, что такая проблема с подключением БД будет…
Эта ошибка может быть связана с тем, что нет подключения к БД??

0

Эксперт .NET

11441 / 7768 / 1190

Регистрация: 21.01.2016

Сообщений: 29,135

10.11.2017, 04:40

6

Лучший ответ Сообщение было отмечено Kurtis как решение

Решение

Kurtis, если бы были проблемы с подклёчением, то вы соответствующую ошибку бы и получили. Убрать префикс схемы нельзя, так как таблица всегда принадлежит какой-то схеме. На вашем скриншоте фигурирует схема «public». Попробуйте указать её вторым параметром в методе ToTable.

1

2719 / 2029 / 375

Регистрация: 22.07.2011

Сообщений: 7,687

10.11.2017, 14:31

7

А почему проблема только с Name_Auto , там же есть и другие таблицы с аналогичным именованием , и в контексте данное свойство обрабатывается далеко не первым.

1.Проверьте , все ли символы в одной кодировке (может там русская буковка затесалась)
2.Посмотрите под профайлером , какие запросы формирует EF к БД.

1

Kurtis

8 / 5 / 3

Регистрация: 13.02.2013

Сообщений: 294

11.11.2017, 17:21

 [ТС]

8

Usaga, sau, таким способом решил свою проблему. Всем спасибо!

C#
1
2
3
4
        protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder builder)
        {
            builder.HasDefaultSchema("public");
        }

0

942 / 617 / 153

Регистрация: 09.09.2011

Сообщений: 1,905

Записей в блоге: 2

12.05.2021, 13:52

9

Тема так то не совсем чтобы про MVC, уж скорее про базы данных.

Цитата
Сообщение от Kurtis
Посмотреть сообщение

Доброго времени суток, при обращении к таблице в БД выскакивает исключение со след. «{«ОШИБКА: 42P01: отношение «dbo.name_auto» не существует»}». Дело в том, что таблица существует, но по какой-то причине найти не может

Ещё один вариант:

— PgAdmin
— свойства базы данных
— Parameters
— добавить параметр «search_path» со списком префиксов схем в которых будет искаться по умолчанию
(в вашем случае просто написать «dbo»)

Документашка: PostgreSQL: Documentation: 9.6: Schemas

0

Sql error 42p01 error relation

Я новичок в создании баз данных, и эта ошибка меня ошеломила, так как я новичок в администрировании БД (в основном я выполняю запросы типа отчетов). Я создал новую базу данных через графический интерфейс pgAdmin3, и я пытаюсь создать объекты БД там, используя SQL, но получаю:

ERROR: relation “replays” does not exist

SQL state: 42P01

Я просмотрел руководство, но не нашел ничего очень полезного, хотя я подозреваю, что это может быть как-то связано с search_path. Вот скриншот. Есть идеи, что я делаю не так, пожалуйста?

Ответ

Я поговорил с кем-то, кто помог мне найти ответ. Правильный синтаксис, для любого в будущем. В документации упоминается об этом, хотя это может быть легко пропустить.

START TRANSACTION;

DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS replays CASCADE;

CREATE SCHEMA replays;

CREATE ROLE admins WITH

  PASSWORD ‘changeme’;

GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA replays TO PUBLIC;

GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA replays TO admins;

COMMIT;

PostgreSQL ERROR: 42P01: relation “[Table]” does not exist

У меня возникла эта странная проблема с использованием PostgreSQL 9.3 с таблицами, созданными с использованием qoutes. Например, если я создаю таблицу с использованием qoutes:

create table “TEST” (“Col1” bigint);

таблица создана правильно, и я вижу, что кавычки сохраняются при просмотре ее на панели SQL в pgAdminIII. Но когда я запрашиваю базу данных, чтобы найти список всех доступных таблиц (используя приведенный ниже запрос), я вижу, что результат не содержит кавычек вокруг имени таблицы.

select table_schema, table_name from information_schema.tables where not table_schema=’pg_catalog’ and not table_schema=’information_schema’;

Поскольку таблица была создана с кавычками, я не могу напрямую использовать имя таблицы, возвращенное из приведенного выше запроса, поскольку оно не заключено в кавычки и выдает ошибку в posted в заголовке.

Я мог бы попробовать заключить имена таблиц в кавычки во всех запросах, но я не уверен, что это будет работать постоянно. Я ищу способ получить список имен таблиц, которые заключены в кавычки в результате.

У меня такая же проблема с именами столбцов, но я надеюсь, что если я смогу найти решение проблемы с именами таблиц, аналогичное решение будет работать и для имен столбцов.

Ответ

у вас есть два варианта: – без кавычек: тогда все автоматически будет в нижнем регистре и без учета регистра – с кавычками: с этого момента все чувствительно к регистру.

я бы настоятельно рекомендовал НЕ использовать кавычки и заставить PostgreSQL вести себя без учета регистра. это делает жизнь намного проще. как только вы начнете цитировать, вы должны использовать его ВЕЗДЕ, поскольку PostgreSQL начнет быть очень точным.

некоторый пример:

  TEST = test <– non case sensitive

  “Test” <> Test <– first is precise, second one is turned to lower case

  “Test” = “Test” <– will work

  “test” = TEST <– should work; but you are just lucky.

действительно старайтесь избегать такого рода уловок любой ценой. для имен объектов используйте 7-битный ascii.

При использовании пакета npg в качестве хранилища данных ORM вы ожидаете, что платформа ORM (в нашем случае Entity Framework) сгенерирует инструкцию sql, вы можете столкнуться с исключением PostgreSQL, отношение “Имя таблицы” не существует

Либо таблица не создана, либо в сгенерированном операторе SQL чего-то не хватает. Попробуйте выполнить отладку с помощью Visual Studio, вы увидите, что имя схемы не является ведущим именем таблицы

SELECT “ID”, “Name”, “CreatedBy”, “CreatedDate”

FROM “TestTable”;

в то время как PostgreSQL ожидает имя схемы. Разрешение находится в классе DbContext переопределите метод OnModelCreating и добавьте modelBuilder.HasDefaultSchema(“SchemaName”); и запустите базовый конструктор, который должен выглядеть следующим образом

protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) {

  modelBuilder.HasDefaultSchema(“PartyDataManager”);

  base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);

}

The error «relation does not exist» in Hibernate + PostgreSQL can occur when trying to access a table in the database that doesn’t exist. This error can be caused by various issues such as incorrect table name, incorrect schema, incorrect database connection, and others. In order to resolve this error, there are several methods that can be followed.

Method 1: Verify the table name

To fix the «relation does not exist» error in Hibernate and PostgreSQL, you can verify the table name in your code. Here are the steps:

  1. Check the entity class that you are using in your Hibernate configuration. Make sure that the table name specified in the @Table annotation matches the actual table name in your PostgreSQL database.
@Entity
@Table(name = "my_table")
public class MyEntity {
    // ...
}
  1. If the table name is correct, check the SQL query generated by Hibernate. You can enable the show_sql property in your Hibernate configuration to see the SQL queries in the console.
<property name="hibernate.show_sql" value="true"/>
  1. Look for the SQL query that is causing the error. Make sure that the table name in the query matches the actual table name in your PostgreSQL database.
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE id = 1
  1. If the table name in the query is correct, check the schema of your PostgreSQL database. Make sure that the table is in the correct schema.
SELECT * FROM my_schema.my_table WHERE id = 1
  1. If the schema is correct, check the permissions of the PostgreSQL user that you are using in your Hibernate configuration. Make sure that the user has permission to access the table.
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON my_table TO my_user;

By following these steps, you should be able to fix the «relation does not exist» error in Hibernate and PostgreSQL.

Method 2: Verify the schema

To fix the «relation does not exist» error when using Hibernate with PostgreSQL in Eclipse, you can verify the schema by following these steps:

  1. Open the PostgreSQL command prompt and connect to your database.

  2. Run the following command to list all the tables in your schema:

  3. Make sure that the table you are trying to access exists in the list.

  4. If the table does not exist, create it using the following command:

    CREATE TABLE <table_name> (
        <column_name> <data_type>,
        ...
    );
  5. If the table exists but the schema is different, you can update it using the following command:

    ALTER TABLE <table_name> 
    ADD COLUMN <column_name> <data_type>;
  6. Make sure that the schema name is correct in your Hibernate configuration file. It should match the schema name in your PostgreSQL database.

    <hibernate-configuration>
        <session-factory>
            ...
            <property name="hibernate.default_schema">public</property>
            ...
        </session-factory>
    </hibernate-configuration>
  7. If you are using annotations to map your entities, make sure that the schema name is specified in the @Table annotation.

    @Entity
    @Table(name = "table_name", schema = "public")
    public class MyEntity {
        ...
    }

By verifying the schema, you can ensure that the table you are trying to access exists in the correct schema and has the correct columns. This should fix the «relation does not exist» error when using Hibernate with PostgreSQL in Eclipse.

Method 3: Verify the database connection

To fix the error «relation does not exist — SQL Error: 0, SQLState: 42P01» in Eclipse with Hibernate and PostgreSQL, you can verify the database connection. Here are the steps:

  1. Open the Hibernate configuration file «hibernate.cfg.xml» and check the database connection settings. Make sure the URL, username, and password are correct.
<property name="hibernate.connection.driver_class">org.postgresql.Driver</property>
<property name="hibernate.connection.url">jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/mydatabase</property>
<property name="hibernate.connection.username">myusername</property>
<property name="hibernate.connection.password">mypassword</property>
  1. Create a simple Java class to test the database connection. Use the Hibernate SessionFactory to get a Session object, and then execute a simple query to check if the table exists.
import org.hibernate.Session;
import org.hibernate.SessionFactory;
import org.hibernate.cfg.Configuration;

public class TestDatabaseConnection {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Configuration cfg = new Configuration();
        cfg.configure("hibernate.cfg.xml");
        SessionFactory sessionFactory = cfg.buildSessionFactory();
        Session session = sessionFactory.openSession();
        String tableName = "mytable";
        String query = "SELECT 1 FROM " + tableName + " LIMIT 1";
        try {
            session.createSQLQuery(query).uniqueResult();
            System.out.println("Table " + tableName + " exists");
        } catch (Exception e) {
            System.err.println("Table " + tableName + " does not exist");
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        session.close();
        sessionFactory.close();
    }

}
  1. Run the Java class and check the output. If the table exists, you should see the message «Table mytable exists». Otherwise, you should see the message «Table mytable does not exist» and the stack trace of the exception.

That’s it! By verifying the database connection, you can confirm if the table exists or not, and then fix the error accordingly.

Method 4: Check if the table exists in the database

To fix the error «relation does not exist» in Hibernate and PostgreSQL, you can check if the table exists in the database before executing the query. Here are the steps to do it:

  1. Get the database metadata:
Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
Connection connection = session.doReturningWork(
    connection -> connection
);
DatabaseMetaData metadata = connection.getMetaData();
  1. Check if the table exists:
ResultSet resultSet = metadata.getTables(
    null, null, "table_name", null
);
boolean tableExists = resultSet.next();
  1. If the table exists, execute the query:
if (tableExists) {
    Query query = session.createQuery("from Entity where ...");
    List<Entity> entities = query.getResultList();
}

Here is the complete code:

Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
Connection connection = session.doReturningWork(
    connection -> connection
);
DatabaseMetaData metadata = connection.getMetaData();
ResultSet resultSet = metadata.getTables(
    null, null, "table_name", null
);
boolean tableExists = resultSet.next();
if (tableExists) {
    Query query = session.createQuery("from Entity where ...");
    List<Entity> entities = query.getResultList();
}

Note that you need to replace «table_name» with the actual name of the table you want to check. Also, you need to replace «Entity» with the name of your Hibernate entity class.

Method 5: Ensure that Hibernate is using the correct dialect

To ensure that Hibernate is using the correct dialect, you need to add the following line to your Hibernate configuration file:

hibernate.dialect=org.hibernate.dialect.PostgreSQLDialect

This will tell Hibernate to use the PostgreSQL dialect, which is necessary for proper interaction with the database.

In addition, make sure that you have the correct PostgreSQL JDBC driver in your project’s classpath. You can download the latest version from the PostgreSQL website.

Here is an example Hibernate configuration file with the PostgreSQL dialect:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE hibernate-configuration PUBLIC
        "-//Hibernate/Hibernate Configuration DTD 3.0//EN"
        "http://www.hibernate.org/dtd/hibernate-configuration-3.0.dtd">
<hibernate-configuration>
    <session-factory>
        <property name="hibernate.connection.driver_class">org.postgresql.Driver</property>
        <property name="hibernate.connection.url">jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/mydatabase</property>
        <property name="hibernate.connection.username">myuser</property>
        <property name="hibernate.connection.password">mypassword</property>
        <property name="hibernate.dialect">org.hibernate.dialect.PostgreSQLDialect</property>
    </session-factory>
</hibernate-configuration>

Make sure to replace the values for hibernate.connection.url, hibernate.connection.username, and hibernate.connection.password with your own database connection details.

With these changes, Hibernate should be able to interact with your PostgreSQL database without any issues.

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Sql state 28000 native 18452 ошибка входа пользователя
  • Spore ошибка 1004 пиратка
  • Sql state 28000 native 18456 ошибка входа пользователя
  • Sql server проверка базы на ошибки
  • Spore ошибка configuration script failed 2000