I have a users table, I see it in pgadmin4, but for some reason when I use psql and try to run list users, I get the following error:
Relation “users” does not exist.
asked Jun 20, 2018 at 0:07
This will happen if the psql user does not have schema level privileges. This error message can be misleading.
To solve this issue, try connecting using psql with an admin user and run:
1.
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO <non-admin-user>;
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO <non-admin-user>;
answered Jun 20, 2018 at 0:12
You need to put table name in quotes.
And, it is case sensitive:
SELECT * FROM "Users";
answered Nov 21, 2020 at 3:52
2
none of the solution mentioned here worked for me untill i wrote the query thus
SELECT * FROM public."Users";
This worked for me.
helvete
2,46513 gold badges33 silver badges37 bronze badges
answered Jun 5 at 13:41
I’ve add new Schema (and remove there my user table) in database so my request was
SELECT "role" FROM "user" ...
But now should be with schema name
SELECT "role" FROM "schemaName"."user" ...
answered Oct 25, 2022 at 5:08
In case of automated test, setting a delay after migrations do the job:
setTimeout(() => {
// queries
}, 1000);
Maybe it is the delay for the database to be done.
The automated test is multithread in my case.
answered Aug 14, 2022 at 12:48
niomuniomu
94 bronze badges
I have a users table, I see it in pgadmin4, but for some reason when I use psql and try to run list users, I get the following error:
Relation “users” does not exist.
asked Jun 20, 2018 at 0:07
This will happen if the psql user does not have schema level privileges. This error message can be misleading.
To solve this issue, try connecting using psql with an admin user and run:
1.
GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO <non-admin-user>;
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO <non-admin-user>;
answered Jun 20, 2018 at 0:12
You need to put table name in quotes.
And, it is case sensitive:
SELECT * FROM "Users";
answered Nov 21, 2020 at 3:52
2
none of the solution mentioned here worked for me untill i wrote the query thus
SELECT * FROM public."Users";
This worked for me.
helvete
2,46513 gold badges33 silver badges37 bronze badges
answered Jun 5 at 13:41
I’ve add new Schema (and remove there my user table) in database so my request was
SELECT "role" FROM "user" ...
But now should be with schema name
SELECT "role" FROM "schemaName"."user" ...
answered Oct 25, 2022 at 5:08
In case of automated test, setting a delay after migrations do the job:
setTimeout(() => {
// queries
}, 1000);
Maybe it is the delay for the database to be done.
The automated test is multithread in my case.
answered Aug 14, 2022 at 12:48
niomuniomu
94 bronze badges
Ниже приведен код программы
package main
import (
"database/sql"
_ "github.com/lib/pq"
"log"
"fmt"
)
const (
DB_USER = "postgres"
DB_PASSWORD = ""
DB_NAME = "test"
)
type User struct {
id int
}
func main() {
dbinfo := fmt.Sprintf("user=%s password=%s dbname=%s sslmode=disable",
DB_USER, DB_PASSWORD, DB_NAME)
db, err := sql.Open("postgres", dbinfo)
defer db.Close()
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
rows, err := db.Query(" SELECT * FROM users ")
defer rows.Close()
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}else{
if(rows.Next()){
usr := new (User)
err := rows.Scan(&usr.id)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
fmt.Println(usr.id)
}
}
}
при запуске выдает следующую ошибку
pq: отношение «users» не существует
exit status 1
Хотя такая таблица есть и ума не приложу что может быть не так
PostgreSQL is an RDBM system that is used for creating databases that store data in tabular form. In PostgreSQL, tables are also referred to as relations. The relations must be named correctly, otherwise, users may encounter an error message. Moreover, the table names are essential for accessing data from PostgreSQL, as they help us retrieve information from the tables.
This guide will explain how to fix the “relation does not exist” error in the PostgreSQL database.
How to Fix the “relation does not exist” Error in Postgres?
The Error “relation does not exist” occurs in the PostgreSQL database when the user makes mistakes while calling the table name. The error message appears if the user has made a spelling mistake, uses the wrong spelling convention, etc. It can also give an error message if the relation is unavailable in the database. To fix the “relation does not exist” error in PostgreSQL databases, follow the simple steps mentioned below:
Prerequisite
To use the PostgreSQL databases and tables, it is required to connect to its server using the following command:
psql --username=postgres
Running the above command will prompt the user to enter the Master password for the PostgreSQL database:
After connecting to the Postgres user in the PostgreSQL server, head into the database by using the following command:
\c JOIN
Executing the above command will direct the user inside the selected database:
Use the following command to get the list of all the tables available in the database with their names:
\dt
Reason 1: Spelling Mistake
A common mistake a user can make while calling the table in the PostgreSQL database is typing the wrong spelling as the following code block contains:
SELECT * FROM Cars;
Running the above code displayed the error that the “relation “cars” does not exist”:
The spelling of the select table is “Car” not “Cars” so the user needs to write the exact spelling of the relations as displayed in the following code block:
SELECT * FROM "Car";
Reason 2: Table is Not Available/Exist
Access the data from the vehicles table using the following query:
SELECT * FROM Vehicles;
Running the above code has displayed the “relation “vehicles” does not exist” error:
Use the following command to get the list of all the tables available in the database:
\dt
The following are the tables available in the PostgreSQL database so the user can access only these tables:
Use the following command to access the “employee” table from the PostgreSQL database:
SELECT * FROM employee;
That’s all about solving the stated error in PostgreSQL when the query cant fetch a table from the database.
Conclusion
To fix the “relation does not exist” error in the PostgreSQL database, simply connect to the PostgreSQL server and head into the database. After that, check all the tables/relations available on the database by using the “\dt” command to get the names of all the tables. After getting the list of all the tables, simply use the correct spelling and case convention to call the table. This guide has explained the process to solve the “relation does not exist” error in PostgreSQL databases.
I’m having this strange problem using PostgreSQL 9.3 with tables that are created using qoutes. For instance, if I create a table using qoutes:
create table "TEST" ("Col1" bigint);
the table is properly created and I can see that the quotes are preserved when view it in the SQL pane of pgAdminIII. But when I query the DB to find the list of all available tables (using the below query), I see that the result does not contain quotes around the table name.
select table_schema, table_name from information_schema.tables where not table_schema='pg_catalog' and not table_schema='information_schema';
Since the table was created with quotes, I can’t use the table name returned from the above query directly since it is unquoted and throws the error in posted in the title.
I could try surrounding the table names with quotes in all queries but I’m not sure if it’ll work all the time. I’m looking for a way to get the list of table names that are quoted with quotes in the result.
I’m having the same issue with column names as well but I’m hoping that if I can find a solution to the table names issue, a similar solution will work for column names as well.
PostgreSQL error 42P01 actually makes users dumbfounded, especially the newbies.
Usually, this error occurs due to an undefined table in newly created databases.
That’s why at Bobcares, we often get requests to fix PostgreSQL errors, as a part of our Server Management Services.
Today, let’s have a look into the PostgreSQL error 42P01 and see how our Support Engineers fix it.
What is PostgreSQL error 42P01?
PostgreSQL has a well-defined error code description. This helps in identifying the reason for the error.
Today, let’s discuss in detail about PostgreSQL error 42P01. The typical error code in PostgreSQL appears as:
ERROR: relation "[Table name]" does not exist
SQL state:42P01
Here the 42P01 denotes an undefined table.
So, the code description clearly specifies the basic reason for the error.
But what does an undefined table means?
Let’s discuss it in detail.
Causes and fixes for the PostgreSQL error 42P01
Customer query on undefined tables of a database often shows up the 42P01 error.
Now let’s see a few situations when our customers get the 42P01 error. We will also see how our Support Engineers fix this error.
1. Improper database setup
Newbies to Postgres often make mistakes while creating a new database. Mostly, this improper setup ends up in a 42P01 error.
In such situations, our Support Team guides them for easy database setup.
Firstly, we create a new database. Next, we create a new schema and role. We give proper privileges to tables.
Postgres also allows users to ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.
2. Unquoted identifiers
Some customers create tables with mixed-case letters.
Usually, the unquoted identifiers are folded into lowercase. So, when the customer queries the table name with the mixed case it shows 42P01 error.
The happens as the PostgreSQL has saved the table name in lower case.
To resolve this error, our Support Engineers give mixed case table name in quotes. Also, we highly recommend to NOT use quotes in database names. Thus it would make PostgreSQL behave non-case sensitive.
3. Database query on a non-public schema
Similarly, the PostgreSQL 42P01 error occurs when a user queries a non-public schema.
Usually, this error occurs if the user is unaware of the proper Postgres database query.
For instance, the customer query on table name ‘pgtable‘ was:
SELECT * FROM pgtable
This query is totally correct in case of a public schema. But, for a non-public schema ‘xx’ the query must be:
SELECT * FROM "xx"."pgtable"
Hence, our Support Engineers ensure that the query uses the correct schema name.
[Still having trouble in fixing PostgreSQL errors? – We’ll fix it for you.]
Conclusion
In short, PostgreSQL error 42P01 denotes the database query is on an undefined table. This error occurs due to improper database setup, unidentified table name, and so on. Today, we saw how our Support Engineers fix the undefined table error in Postgres.
PREVENT YOUR SERVER FROM CRASHING!
Never again lose customers to poor server speed! Let us help you.
Our server experts will monitor & maintain your server 24/7 so that it remains lightning fast and secure.
GET STARTED
var google_conversion_label = «owonCMyG5nEQ0aD71QM»;
What you had originally was a correct syntax — for tables, not for schemas. As you did not have a table (dubbed ‘relation’ in the error message), it threw the not-found error.
I see you’ve already noticed this — I believe there is no better way of learning than to fix our own mistakes
But there is something more. What you are doing above is too much on one hand, and not enough on the other.
Running the script, you
- create a schema
- create a role
- grant
SELECT
on all tables in the schema created in (1.) to this new role_ - and, finally, grant all privileges (
CREATE
andUSAGE
) on the new schema to the new role
The problem lies within point (3.) You granted privileges on tables in replays
— but there are no tables in there! There might be some in the future, but at this point the schema is completely empty. This way, the GRANT
in (3.) does nothing — this way you are doing too much.
But what about the future tables?
There is a command for covering them: ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
. It applies not only to tables, but:
Currently [as of 9.4], only the privileges for tables (including views and foreign tables), sequences, functions, and types (including domains) can be altered.
There is one important limitation, too:
You can change default privileges only for objects that will be created by yourself or by roles that you are a member of.
This means that a table created by alice
, who is neither you nor a role than you are a member of (can be checked, for example, by using du
in psql
), will not take the prescribed access rights. The optional FOR ROLE
clause is used for specifying the ‘table creator’ role you are a member of. In many cases, this implies it is a good idea to create all database objects using the same role — like mydatabase_owner
.
A small example to show this at work:
CREATE ROLE test_owner; -- cannot log in
CREATE SCHEMA replays AUTHORIZATION test_owner;
GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA replays TO test_owner;
SET ROLE TO test_owner; -- here we change the context,
-- so that the next statement is issued as the owner role
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA replays GRANT SELECT ON TABLES TO alice;
CREATE TABLE replays.replayer (r_id serial PRIMARY KEY);
RESET ROLE; -- changing the context back to the original role
CREATE TABLE replays.replay_event (re_id serial PRIMARY KEY);
-- and now compare the two
dp replays.replayer
Access privileges
Schema │ Name │ Type │ Access privileges │ Column access privileges
─────────┼──────────┼───────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────
replays │ replayer │ table │ alice=r/test_owner ↵│
│ │ │ test_owner=arwdDxt/test_owner │
dp replays.replay_event
Access privileges
Schema │ Name │ Type │ Access privileges │ Column access privileges
─────────┼──────────────┼───────┼───────────────────┼──────────────────────────
replays │ replay_event │ table │ │
As you can see, alice
has no explicit rights on the latter table. (In this case, she can still SELECT
from the table, being a member of the public
pseudorole, but I didn’t want to clutter the example by revoking the rights from public
.)
I’m new to SQL. I was trying to run sql schema, here is a part of code
create table PageColours (
id serial,
userID serial references users(id),
--references users(id),
isTemplate boolean default'false',
name NameValue not null unique,
primary key (id)
);
create table People (
id serial,
email EmailValue not null unique,
givenName NameValue not null,
familyName NameValue,
invitedID serial references Events(id),
attendedID serial references Events(id),
primary key (id)
);
create table users(
id serial
references People(id),
passWord varchar not null,
BillingAddress serial not null
references Places(id),
HomeAddress serial
references Places(id),
ListID serial
references ContactLists(id),
ColorID serial
references PageColours(id),
primary key (id)
);
It returns[2020-07-03 15:28:19] [42P01] ERROR: relation "people" does not exist
[2020-07-03 15:28:19] [42P01] ERROR: relation "users" does not exist
In fact all foreign key reference table reference not exist. When i remove the reference, the table can be created, can someone please help me ?
I’m new to SQL. I was trying to run sql schema, here is a part of code
create table PageColours (
id serial,
userID serial references users(id),
--references users(id),
isTemplate boolean default'false',
name NameValue not null unique,
primary key (id)
);
create table People (
id serial,
email EmailValue not null unique,
givenName NameValue not null,
familyName NameValue,
invitedID serial references Events(id),
attendedID serial references Events(id),
primary key (id)
);
create table users(
id serial
references People(id),
passWord varchar not null,
BillingAddress serial not null
references Places(id),
HomeAddress serial
references Places(id),
ListID serial
references ContactLists(id),
ColorID serial
references PageColours(id),
primary key (id)
);
It returns[2020-07-03 15:28:19] [42P01] ERROR: relation "people" does not exist
[2020-07-03 15:28:19] [42P01] ERROR: relation "users" does not exist
In fact all foreign key reference table reference not exist. When i remove the reference, the table can be created, can someone please help me ?
- Remove From My Forums
-
Question
-
public bool girisKontrol(string user, string pass) {string sunucu, port, kullaniciadi, sifre, veritabani; sunucu = "localhost"; port = "5432"; kullaniciadi = "postgres"; sifre = "tellioglu"; veritabani = "postgres"; string baglantimetni = string.Format("Server ={0};Port ={1};User ID = {2};Password = {3};Database={4};", sunucu, port, kullaniciadi, sifre, veritabani); var baglanti = new NpgsqlConnection(); baglanti.ConnectionString = baglantimetni; var cmd = new NpgsqlCommand(); cmd.Connection = baglanti; cmd.CommandText = "select * from kullanicigiris where Kullaniciadi = @Kullanici and sifre = @sifre";//kullanicigiris tablonun adi , Kullaniciadi sütünun adı,sifre sütunun adi cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Kullanici", user); cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@sifre", pass); cmd.Connection.Open(); var reader = cmd.ExecuteReader(); var sonuc = reader.HasRows; reader.Close(); reader.Dispose(); cmd.Connection.Close(); cmd.Connection.Dispose(); cmd.Dispose(); return sonuc; }
i am using postgreSQL database . executereader(); giving ‘ERROR: 42P01: relation does not exist’ problem. is sql line wrong i dont know please help me
Answers
-
From the code sinppet, I don’t think it’s the SQL line error. In C#, we should use the SQL parameters like yours.
But for postgreSQL, I would suggest you to try the following code to see if it works.
cmd.CommandText = "select * from kullanicigiris where Kullaniciadi = :Kullanici and sifre = :sifre" cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue(":Kullanici", user); cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue(":sifre", pass);
And there is a category for postgreSQL support query for your reference:
http://www.postgresql.org/support/
Hope it hleps.
Best Regards,
Rocky Yue[MSFT]
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
-
Marked as answer by
Wednesday, May 2, 2012 2:51 AM
-
Marked as answer by
-
PostgreSQL
-
Администрирование баз данных
При подключении к базе данных (postgreSQL) с программы-клиента выдается ошибка 42Р01 отношение «dbo.users» не существует. Что делать и с чем это связано?
-
Вопрос заданболее трёх лет назад
-
3061 просмотр
1
комментарий
-
1. БД не подключена, проверьте.
Решения вопроса 1
-
Я так и не понял откуда удалить надо, в postgresql все вроде норм
Пригласить эксперта
Похожие вопросы
-
Показать ещё
Загружается…
29 янв. 2023, в 03:07
300000 руб./за проект
29 янв. 2023, в 02:16
700000 руб./за проект
29 янв. 2023, в 01:54
5000 руб./за проект